Voices from The Jobs Letter No.68 / 3 November 1997 Here are some of the comments made in the submissions to the "questions for consultation": REGIONAL DELIVERY 1. What should be the objectives of regional delivery? "Equal opportunities for all community sectors, to be impartial, offer equity, ensure privacy
and confidentiality, recognise the unique employment factors of the region, be receptive to
Kaupapa Maori, recognise the individuality of each client, provide an environment which allows a
holistic cultural approach to solutions for Maori long-term unemployed through positive
discrimination ..."
"Provide assistance to individuals on a case-by-case basis as relevant to the needs of the
individual and to minimise the level of time spent out of the workforce. Assistance provided must be
cost-effective in terms of overall outcomes and minimise displacement effects and dead-weight costs."
2. What do you believe should be the basis for determining the size, and consequently, the number of regions? "The basis for determining the size and number of regions should be geographical distances. It
is not considered workable to set up regions as Health have done because each province is
uniquely different and what is good for Christchurch is not good for the West Coast of the South Island
or Invercargill."
"Regional Commissioners should not just be appointed to cover geographical areas, they
should also be appointed to cover specific communities for whom long-term unemployment is an
issue ..."
3. On what basis should funds be allocated in the region? "Enough funds should be allocated to cater for the region's needs and be granted for
triennial periods."
"Maori and Pacific Islands people should be weighted by an extra factor of 40% since
much structural adult unemployment is among these groups..."
"Funding should contain a strong element of outcome-based criteria reflecting the needs
and opportunities in the region. That is, successful schemes should be expanded in preference
to unsuccessful ones..."
4. How should funds be distributed? "A set allocation needs to be available for each region to cover management costs with
discretionary funding allocated on population and unemployment levels. A bid for funds on the basis
of outcomes could be punitive in rural areas where there are few employment opportunities..."
"As a baseline, say 70% of available funds, distributed on the basis of general
population, weighted by unemployment levels. The balance, say 30% contestable for innovative
projects involving identified target groups and reinforcing and building on successful projects..."
5. Should there continue to be a set of national functions which are delivered by all regions in the same way? If so, what would these be? "Whether or not the same national functions remain in place, there needs to be some
continuation of their focus, for example, the priority risk groups of Maori, Pacific Islanders, women and
rural/urban disadvantaged. The administrative/operational procedures of handling job seekers should
be nationally consistent. That is, they enrol, interview, report and advance in the same way from
one end of the country to the other..."
6. What should be the role of the proposed Regional Employment Committees? "Research and analysis of submitted schemes, establish systems to assess schemes as
they progress, assess completed schemes, prepare local guidelines. Must have control of
funding. Should have autonomy to select schemes. Ensure existing workers and jobs are not displaced..."
"To be the focus for community interest and action on employment and work-related issues.
To facilitate the co-operation of agencies of local, regional and central government. To be the
sounding board for local ideas, strategies and plans. To set the local agenda for action. To provide
the accountability mechanism for the Regional Employment Commissioner."
"We do not agree with the Regional Employment Committees. This is a concept that has
been tried and proven to be ineffective under the different schemes such as REAC, STEPS and TAPS."
7. Who should be represented on the regional committees? "Those who are aware of the community's and the unemployed's needs. Must include those
who have experienced unemployment and those who in their daily work are faced with the
repercussions of unemployment eg. social agencies. Also representatives of different groups involved
in the area of unemployment and employment. Nominees determined by the local community."
""More discussion is needed about the process by which people get appointed to the
committee. REAC members were appointed by the government and usually had close connections to
the party in government. This is unavoidable to some extent but different sectors should
nominate their own representatives..."
COMMUNITY WORK AND TRAINING 1. Who should be available to engage in Community Work? Who should be available to engage in training? "The sheer size of the unemployment register means that some arbitrary criteria must be used
to try and screen those for whom community work would be the most appropriate. It would
probably be appropriate to concentrate on long-term unemployment first. The sheer size of the
unemployment register would suggest that within this group it would probably be useful to start
with volunteers. People who want to go on such programmes are likely to contribute the most,
and gain some benefits from participating..."
" Community work and training should be mutually interchangeable alternatives, depending
upon the identified needs of the person seeking or requiring assistance. Community training
should therefore be available to all those who seek this assistance..."
2. Should Community Work be mandatory? Should training be mandatory? If so, for whom? "Yes, especially for those registered 26 weeks or longer provided appropriate training is
available and the work is accessible (eg. travel is available)."
"Our information is that historically, compulsory attendance at either work or training
schemes has not achieved a successful outcome for the participant. Further, unwilling participants
can often be a disruptive influence or even sabotage the entire programme for other participants."
"It depends on the quality and `good fit' of the training. The best option would be to have
a client-centred scheme in which local provision offers a wide range of options ..."
3. What types of activity should qualify as Community Work? "Any activity that will be of benefit or improve the life of people within the community, while
at the same time community work should advance the position of those involved. Include
school-based, marae-based, sports club-based, church-based work programmes. Should include an
element of training/education/upskilling..."
"We stress our view that if funding is made available it would be far more beneficial to offer
the work on the open market creating genuine employment and offering considerable efficiencies
over a government-administered work scheme."
"Current government funding has made all possible sectors of community work subject to
contestable funding. There is a real danger that the introduction of community work agencies
will give significant competitive advantage to those employing workers under the proposed
scheme. There is no field of social or community work that can be funded without this becoming a
problem..."
4. What types of training activity should qualify? "Anything that leads to full-time employment."
"Training should only be introduced that is linked to the NZ Qualification Framework. This
is very important if unemployed people are going to gain value for their effort..."
"Training under the employment schemes should be linked to and utilise industry training
standards set by industry training organisations..."
5. What is the best way of ensuring that Community Work does not displace existing or prospective paid work? "You're dreaming! It is dishonest to suggest this programme will not displace paid work given
the lack of funding of the community sector..."
"I believe 10-20% of community work will replace existing low skills workers no matter
how careful we are. However, extra employment will be created at this level in supervising and
administering community work..."
"Ensure there are effective monitoring systems in place put the emphasis on projects in
the community that targets areas that cannot afford them.."
COMMUNITY WAGE 1. Should Community Wage levels be set higher, lower or about the same as comparable benefit levels? "So long as the scheme is not compulsory, the community wage must be at least the
minimum wage otherwise it isn't a wage. The net amount paid weekly to the worker must exceed
the benefit at a level which will provide a realistic incentive. The unemployment benefit must
remain for people who are out of work."
"Should be set higher to encourage the job seeker to participate in positive and financially
rewarding work experience. Care should be taken not to overly penalise those who are seriously
job-seeking and would prefer to spend time doing so rather than community work or training..."
2. Should the Community Wage be more like a wage or a benefit? "For attitudinal reasons self esteem and dignity the community wage should be seen as
a wage paid for valued assistance to people or improvements to the environment where they
live. Community wage projects should be conceived and presented as opportunities for enhancing
the quality of life of the people in the community and region and those who visit it."
"We do not see the same need to have a higher benefit for participants in training. They are
gaining the benefits of qualifications which will help them in the future. The current situation,
where students receive an additional travel allowance, works well. Other students have to pay to
do training."
"You pay the person a wage for doing a job. Housing allowances, rent allowance etc should
be separate issues but based on the new wage structure."
"When unemployed people are required to take up work positions on pain of loss or reduction
of benefit (in any sector) such jobs must be full-time and waged. Of course at this point the person
is in no longer in receipt of a benefit..."
"The scheme will need to be in the nature of an employment relationship with the
government, with the core benefit being characterised as a community wage. Add-ons for dependants,
accommodation costs etc will need to remain as part of the welfare system..."
Source "Analysis of Public Submissions on Government Employment Strategy" for the Employment Implementation Steering Group (June 1997) available from EISG at P.O.Box 1115, Wellington
see also The Jobs Letter No.68
|