from The Jobs Letter No.104 / 3 August 1999 "The focus all the way through is superficial rather than substance. They've got the colour schemes right but the computers don't work. They run the television advertisements, but the phone lines are clogged. "When you run through the list of spending it all points to appalling practice that the two
Winz Ministers should have stopped very quickly. It's not good enough to say they don't have
responsibility for operational matters..."
"Ms Rankin runs a corporation. Such terminology was once confined to a private enterprise.
She evidently runs it with charisma. That was once confined to preachers in born-again
religions. Faced with the current storm of criticism she's sticking to her guns. "I lead this place with
a passion, " she said, adding, "I intend to continue leading it with a vengeance." Vengeance
against whom was not explained..."
"Corporate profile? The public does not care about corporate profiles. It cares about the organisation fulfiling its purpose: bringing together jobs and those who need them, or, if that is not possible, ensuring that those entitled to benefits receive them in efficient fashion [...] "This branding is nonsense, and all the energy and money expended on it, has to stop. The
public service once had a reputation for taking advantage of the taxpayer at the bottom end of the
pay scale. Now it seems it is those at the top end of the pay scale who have forgotten who they
work for..."
"Let's not disparage Winz too much. There's a refreshing zaniness about the logic that it
creates jobs by producing a television commercial showing how it creates jobs. Even better is the
method of creating jobs by producing a commercial showing how it will create jobs by producing a
commercial that will show it how it creates jobs. Is this the start of an infinite regress?"
"To facilitate the commercialisation of this organisation, the old culture of public service must
be destroyed and the dangerous concept of citizen entitlement rooted out forever. In the
department's world, the unfortunate citizen stands before the nattily dressed employee of the business
as neither a customer or a client, but as a "case" to be managed..."
"Something has gone seriously awry at Winz. The department which is supposed to cater for
the poorest New Zealanders is lost in a managerial fantasyland of insane opulence and
corporate hokum. All of this nonsense is only a symptom of a wider sickness. A couple of other
public agencies have reportedly cancelled their Wairakei conferences as a result of the uproar
over Rankin's department. Our taxpayer-funded entrepreneurs have lived high on the hog for much
too long, and now they must stop. Sacking Rankin is a good place to start. It would also serve as
a warning to the others..."
"Ministers now have little say in the hiring of departmental heads and minimal control over departmental spending. It is up to chief executives to determine how they use their budgets to deliver the outcomes sought by the ministers. "Mr Sowry and Peter McCardle have asked State Services Commissioner Michael
Wintringham to investigate Christine Rankin's role in the hiring of the planes. But they may have to do more
to convince the public that the government has not lost control of public-sector spending..."
"Mrs Shipley blames Labour for introducing the system that puts chief executives at arms length from ministers, while acknowledging there has been much productive change. Though she now appears to be irked that ministers cannot apply direct political leverage, she does not intend to restore their prerogative to hire and fire. "In the meantime, a rather flaccid State Services Commission deservedly stands in the gun.
Successive commissioners have ratcheted up chief executives' salaries, and failed to rein in a
public sector culture of extravagance expressed in consultancies running to seed, golden
handshakes, and a fascination with public relations razzmatazz over matters of substance ..."
"The problem with Work and Income NZ can be identified with its chief executive's use of
the word "customers". She imagines she is managing a corporation and is trying to apply the
same simple set of ideas which govern the corporate world within a quite inappropriate environment ..."
" The rationale behind Winz's creation - that providing unemployment benefits and advertising job vacancies fit naturally together - has been lost in a welter of waste. Any efficiencies of the new arrangement were soon overshadowed by the controversy of the Winz $1.5 million campaign against benefit crime. The organisation became best known not for the quality of its help but for encouraging people to dob in beneficiaries thought to be rorting the system. " It is therefore ironic that the people in charge of Winz are facing scrutiny over their calls
on taxpayer funds. Rather than concentrate on competent delivery of its primary services, Winz
has embarked on a corporate spending spree. It has dissipated $250,000 in trying to counteract
criticism. That has been totally counterproductive. Indeed, it has guaranteed more flak for the
ailing organisation..."
" The `dob-in-a-beneficiary' campaign cost Winz $1.5 million to track down bludgers. In
damage control to cover this, and other departmental gaffes, whinging Winz spent a quarter million
dollars to justify/explain/and excuse their blunder. Perhaps Winz `think big' directors, in wasting
huge sums of money, are more guilty of defrauding taxpayers than the lowly paid and
unemployed `bludgers'..."
"The "branding manager", as Winz confirmed the job title, exposed how far the civil service has travelled in a short time, and how quickly the route has become dangerously downhill. At a stroke, the pot-plant manager has undone, in the all-important public's eyes, whatever good and inspiration may have come from Christine Rankin's delusional videos ... "Whoever dreamed up this caper is richly splattered with egg, and the fact that they can
easily afford the hairdressing and dry cleaning bill won't make the mess disappear any faster. Instead
of being inspired by the message from their $250,000-a-year chief, Winz staff are humiliated
and angry. They are reeling from the public hostility as beneficiaries and taxpayers alike react to
the litany of extravagance..."
"You are always in the shit in this industry. Only the depth of it changes..."
|